“Soon, some of the career prosecutors who had worked on the inquiry for more than two years expressed concern. They believed that Mr. Vance, who had decided not to seek re-election, was pushing too hard for an indictment before leaving office, and that the evidence gathered so far did not justify the speed at which the inquiry was moving.
The debate was born of painful experience from past investigations, including one involving the Trump family. In 2012, in the first of his three terms, Mr. Vance closed an investigation into accusations that Mr. Trump’s son Donald Jr. and his daughter Ivanka had misled potential buyers of apartments at one of the Trump Organization’s New York hotels, Trump Soho. The decision trailed Mr. Vance for years, subjecting him to criticism after Mr. Trump was elected president.”
Adam Leitman Bailey was on the Trump-Soho Case in 2012. In the above referenced article there is a link to the following article where Adam Leitman Bailey was quoted. It should be noted that Mr Bailey prevailed against president Donald Trump in the Trump-Soho Case.
For the full 2022 article online
For previous The New York Times Articles regarding this case